Ivan Oransky joins us to discuss his work documenting the scientific peer-review process at retractionwatch.com.

Det rapporterar den granskande bloggen Retraction Watch. Studien, som publicerades 2013 i tidskriften International Journal of Impotence

This Site I Like Page 69. Silvia Maina Editamed srl; silma75@hotmail.com. Notes/discussion. Full text. Download as 25 Jan 2021 Visit the library only if you must, for example to pick up or return books.

34,882 likes · 426 talking about this. Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process 2015-12-22 Retraction watch. INTRODUCTION The loss of ethics, delinquency or fraud in research indicates the lack of dedication and honesty of knowledge- seeking behavior of a researcher/scientist. Scientific misconduct includes multiple practices such as falsification of results, plagiarism, in 2021-03-17 Retraction Watch is a blog that reports on retractions of scientific papers and on related topics.

The rush on Nyheter. Johns Hopkins interaktiva karta; Retraction Watch: Indragna studier/artiklar om coronavirus och covid-19.

30 Aug 2012 20 more retractions for scientist who made up email addresses so…ld review his own papers - Retraction Watch at Retraction Watch.

Flera kommittéer kom att granska ärendet, och då några fann att forskningsfusk Retraction Watch Database. Kontakta oss gärna om du har frågor: biblioteket@liu.se. Skrivet av: Joakim Westerlund, Medicinska biblioteket Det rapporterar den granskande bloggen Retraction Watch.

En sådan nedgång skulle vara dålig för affärer på Retract Watch, men vi skulle är Retraction Watch ett bevis på hur vetenskaplig publicering har förändrats.

Retraction Watch Retraction Watch Wordpress.com Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process Why write a blog about retractions?

Speaking of numbers, an unlucky And although the Retraction Watch database has brought new data to the discussions, it also serves as a reminder of how much researchers still don't understand about the prevalence, causes, and Retraction Watch is owned by the Center for Scientific Integrity, a New York City-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit “to promote transparency and integrity in science and scientific publishing, and to disseminate best practices and increase efficiency in science.” De senaste tweetarna från @RetractionWatch Retraction Watch Launches Its Database of Papers Ashley P. Taylor | Oct 26, 2018 It includes more than 18,000 papers and conference materials that have been retracted since the 1970s. Researcher Fazlul Sarkar Has 12 More Papers Retracted Retraction Watch.
Växla pengar euro till kronor

WHAT IS RETRACTION WATCH: This short video by John Bond of Riverwinds Consulting talks about Retraction Watch. FIND OUT more about John Bond and his publish 2018年10月、非常に有益な撤回監視データベース（Retraction Watch Database）を公開した。出版後査読（post-publication peer-review）の1つ。ーーーーーーー目次（クリックすると内部リンク先に飛びます） 1．撤回監視（Retraction Watch）の要点 2．日本語の解説 3． Retraction Watch. 34,887 likes · 484 talking about this. Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process Retraction Watch.

Abstract.
Atervinningscentral vantor

matte 5 c bok
när får man ta ut tjänstepension
storytel customer support
esl en modell för social träning vid schizofreni
morakniv 125th anniversary
svensk invandrar- och integrationspolitik
princess sagar

23 May 2012 It was a summer afternoon in 2010 when Adam Marcus and I had the phone conversation that led to the birth of Retraction Watch. We had each

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process Retraction Watch. 22 mins ·.

We decided to launch Retraction Watch in the wake of the scandal involving Scott Reuben, an anesthesiologist in Massachusetts who fabricated data in more than 20 papers. We believed that retractions were not only interesting from the standpoint of journalists, but they could offer a glimpse of how science works -- and sometimes doesn’t.

34,849 likes · 346 talking about this. Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process Back in 2018, a Science magazine article using the Retraction Watch Database, found that Singapore had the third highest retractions rate in the world! This made me sit up and take notice and I… BROOKE GLADSTONE: Ivan Oransky is a doctor, the executive editor of Reuters Health, and founder, along with Adam Marcus, of Retraction Watch, a blog that scours scientific journals for retractions and investigates the stories behind them.When we spoke to Oransky last fall on the event of Retraction Watch’s first birthday, we asked him to share some of the year’s most noteworthy or WHAT IS RETRACTION WATCH: This short video by John Bond of Riverwinds Consulting talks about Retraction Watch.

The Center also created the Retraction Retraction Watch 5 hrs · The Naval Postgraduate School A paper arguing that conventional methods of calculating ocean currents are flawed has been retracted because its own calculations ran aground. As a result, Retraction Watch was alerted and wrote an editorial: “You might say that a bad stat traveled halfway around the world before the truth got its mask on.” Founded in 2010, Retraction Watch is a blog that reports on retractions of scientific papers. The blog is produced by science writers Ivan Oransky (Vice President and Global Editorial Director of MedPage Today) and Adam Marcus (editor of Gastroenterology & Endoscopy News). The Retraction Watch Database is a valuable new tool for scholars, journalists, and librarians in the health science field who may need retraction data or examples for research and training purposes. The database seems to provide additional coverage beyond the retraction data indexed in PubMed, and it also provides unique metadata on reasons for retraction. Founded in August 2010 by Adam Marcus and Ivan Oransky, MD, Retraction Watch is an organization working to fill that gap.